Vendor Scorecard + QBR Kit

A simple vendor governance system that improves service, reduces billing issues, and strengthens renewal leverage

Run the OperationCoreKit30 min setup

What you'll accomplish

With this kit you will:

  • Rate vendors consistently (not based on vibes or whoever complained last)
  • Create a clean record of performance issues and improvements
  • Make renewals easier by having evidence (score trends, issue logs, fixes)
  • Reduce billing disputes by tracking billing integrity as a performance metric
  • Run structured monthly check-ins and quarterly QBRs
  • Hold vendors accountable without creating constant conflict

Who this is for

  • Procurement & Ops leaders who manage service vendors
  • Property/Facilities managers who rely on vendors daily
  • Finance teams who want fewer invoice problems
  • Anyone who wants service stability and leverage during renewal negotiations

When to use this

  • Vendor performance is inconsistent
  • Issues are repeatedly raised but never fixed
  • You don't have a paper trail at renewal time
  • Billing quality is poor (misc charges, vague descriptions, late invoices)
  • You want a lightweight system that doesn't feel like bureaucracy

Prerequisites

Quick start (30 minutes)

Pick one vendor to pilot this week.

Create a scorecard using Template 1
Choose 5 metrics (start with the default set below)
Rate the vendor for the last 30 days (1–5)
Create an Issue Log (Template 2)
Schedule a 30-minute monthly vendor check-in (Template 3)
Put a QBR on the calendar for 90 days out (Template 4)

The core concept (plain English)

You don't manage vendors by having opinions.
You manage vendors by having:

  • standards
  • measurements
  • a cadence
  • a record of actions and fixes

Beginner rule: If it isn't written down, it didn't happen (at renewal time).

Step-by-step system

1

Define the minimum scorecard (keep it simple)

What to do

  • Start with 5 categories (1–5 scale):
  • 1) Service quality
  • 2) Responsiveness (speed + communication)
  • 3) Scope adherence (did they do what they said, no "creative scope")
  • 4) Billing integrity (clean invoices, correct rates, change orders followed)
  • 5) Compliance & safety (COI, onboarding, site rules)

Done looks like

A scorecard table you can complete in under 10 minutes per month

Common mistake

Creating 20 metrics. Nobody maintains it.

2

Create a shared definition for each score (so ratings are consistent)

What to do

  • For each category define what 1, 3, and 5 mean.
  • Example:
  • • Billing integrity = 5 means "invoice matches scope/rates, all extras have CO IDs, documentation attached"
  • • Billing integrity = 1 means "vague invoices, missing documentation, frequent corrections needed"

Done looks like

People can rate consistently even if a different person is scoring this month

Common mistake

Rating based on recent frustration ("recency bias").

3

Track issues and actions (the issue log is where governance actually happens)

What to do

  • If you don't track:
  • • issue
  • • date
  • • impact
  • • owner
  • • vendor response
  • • resolution
  • …then problems repeat forever.

Done looks like

A running issue log reviewed monthly

Common mistake

Issues live in email threads and disappear.

4

Run a monthly check-in (30 minutes)

What to do

  • Monthly check-ins should:
  • • review scorecard
  • • review issue log
  • • agree on actions and owners
  • • confirm billing/approval expectations

Done looks like

A structured recurring meeting that creates improvements

Common mistake

Turning check-ins into venting sessions without actions.

5

Run a quarterly QBR (60 minutes)

What to do

  • QBRs should:
  • • review 90-day performance trend
  • • review open issues and root causes
  • • review upcoming changes (sites, scope, schedule)
  • • align on renewal expectations (terms, scope, pricing principles)

Done looks like

A predictable accountability rhythm that strengthens leverage

Common mistake

Using the QBR as the first time you bring up major issues.

6

Tie scorecards to renewals (this is where it pays off)

What to do

  • At T-120/T-90 (renewal window):
  • • pull the last 6–12 months of scores
  • • summarize the top 3 issues
  • • decide: renew / renegotiate / rebid
  • • translate issues into contract fixes (SLA, scope clarity, billing rules)

Done looks like

Renewal Decision Memo is evidence-based, not political

Common mistake

Renewing "as-is" because switching vendors feels hard.

Templates included

Template 1 — Vendor Scorecard (spreadsheet columns)

Use monthly ratings (1–5).

VendorMonthService qualityResponsivenessScope adherenceBilling integrityCompliance & safetyOverall (avg)Notes
Add vendor rows here...

Optional add-ons (only if needed): Sustainability/data cooperation (for Scope 3 readiness), Reporting timeliness, Tenant satisfaction (if relevant)

Template 2 — Issue Log (spreadsheet columns)

Field
Date opened
Vendor
Site
Issue
Impact (cost/risk/service)
Severity (L/M/H)
Owner
Vendor owner
Target fix date
Status
Resolution notes

Template 3 — Monthly Vendor Check-in Agenda (30 minutes)

Monthly Vendor Check-in (30 minutes)

1) Scorecard review (10 min)
- Scores this month vs last month
- What drove changes?

2) Issue log review (10 min)
- Open issues and status
- Root cause (vendor / site access / unclear scope / scheduling)

3) Actions (8 min)
- Actions list with owners and dates
- Confirm what evidence is required (photos, logs, receipts)

4) Billing expectations (2 min)
- Remind: Change Order ID required for extra work
- Documentation requirements for pass-throughs

Template 4 — QBR Agenda + Slide Outline (60 minutes)

Quarterly Business Review (60 minutes)

Pre-read (send 48 hours before):
- Last 3 months scorecard
- Issue log summary
- Any disputed invoice summary

Agenda:
1) Highlights and lowlights (10 min)
2) Performance trend (15 min)
- Score trends
- Repeat issue themes
3) Operational improvements (15 min)
- Process changes
- Staffing changes
- Preventive maintenance improvements
4) Billing integrity and controls (10 min)
- Change orders compliance
- Documentation compliance
5) Next quarter plan (10 min)
- Site changes
- Scope changes
- Success metrics

Template 5 — Score definitions (1/3/5 anchors)

Service quality
- 5: Work completed correctly first time; minimal rework; proactive prevention
- 3: Work generally acceptable; occasional rework
- 1: Frequent rework; repeated failures

Responsiveness
- 5: Responds within agreed timeframe; clear communication; closes loop
- 3: Responds but inconsistently; some chasing needed
- 1: Slow response; poor communication; missed commitments

Scope adherence
- 5: Works within scope; flags extras before starting; clear documentation
- 3: Occasional scope ambiguity; sometimes corrected after follow-up
- 1: Regular scope creep; unclear "extras" billed without approval

Billing integrity
- 5: Invoices match contract rates; extras have Change Order IDs; pass-throughs documented
- 3: Minor corrections needed; generally compliant
- 1: Frequent errors; vague descriptions; missing documentation; repeated disputes

Compliance & safety
- 5: COI current; follows site rules; safety reporting consistent
- 3: Mostly compliant; occasional admin chasing required
- 1: Repeated compliance gaps; safety issues or documentation missing

Template 6 — Vendor performance improvement email

Subject: Performance improvement plan — [Vendor]

Hi [Name],
Based on our scorecard and issue log, we need improvement in:
1) [issue theme]
2) [issue theme]
3) [issue theme]

Success metrics for next 30 days:
- [metric]
- [metric]
- [metric]

Actions agreed:
- Vendor: [action + date]
- Us: [action + date]

We will review progress in our monthly check-in on [date].
Thanks,
[Name]

Common pitfalls and edge cases

Common pitfalls

  • Scorecard exists but no cadence (it becomes a spreadsheet graveyard)
  • Too many metrics → nobody updates it
  • No shared score definitions → ratings become political
  • Issues tracked but no owners/dates
  • Not tying performance to renewal leverage

Edge cases

  • Multi-site vendors: add a "site breakdown" view (one scorecard per site or a site average + notes)
  • Seasonal vendors (landscaping/snow): score within season; do a season-end review
  • Critical vendors (elevators/security): focus on continuity risk; build redundancy plan before rebid
  • Tenant-facing vendors: add tenant satisfaction as a single metric if you can measure it

How to prove impact

  • Score trend improvement over 2–3 months
  • Reduction in repeat issues
  • Reduction in invoice disputes / corrections
  • Improved service SLAs (response/close time)
  • Renewal outcomes backed by evidence (renegotiated terms, avoided auto-renew, rebid decisions)

Evidence and Confidence

Confidence: High (scorecards + cadence + issue logs are standard vendor governance tools).

Assumptions: You can dedicate 30 minutes/month/vendor for top vendors.

Where this can fail: If leadership doesn't back enforcement, or if teams don't maintain the issue log.

Change log

v1.0 (2026-01): Latest release