Prevent savings from dying in transition: award decision rules, cutover plan, service guardrails, and risk controls.
Savings die in the transition phase when:
This kit installs a simple transition governance system.
Your award should be defensible:
Cutover is a project, not an email.
You need a short, intense window to stabilize performance.
Rollback should be based on objective criteria, not fear.
Copyable template (TEXT)
Award Decision Record Category: Supplier selected: Date: Approvers: Decision factors: - Price and benchmark comparison: - Service levels: - Implementation plan: - Risk notes: Decision: - Award approved - Award deferred - Re-bid required
Copyable template (TEXT)
Cutover Plan | Milestone | Owner | Date | Notes | | --------- | ----- | ---- | ----- | | Contract signature | | | | | Rate card finalized | | | | | Supplier onboarding complete | | | | | Buying channel enforced | | | | | Old suppliers blocked | | | | | First invoice review | | | |
Copyable template (TEXT)
First 60 Days Service Guardrails Weekly check-in: - Service levels met: [yes/no] - Exceptions and escalations: - Invoice issues: - Corrective actions: Stop conditions: - Any safety risk event - Repeated missed service levels without corrective action
Copyable template (TEXT)
Rollback Plan Rollback triggers: - Trigger 1: - Trigger 2: - Trigger 3: Rollback steps: 1) Notify stakeholders 2) Re-enable prior supplier channel temporarily 3) Document failure mode and corrective action plan 4) Decide re-attempt timeline
v1.0 (2026-01): Latest release